Archives for category: Uncategorized

                                                                              trying to correct time…spacetime is 3dimentions of space,,and an infinite singular multidimentional time…each unit of plank(for lack of a better word) time is a dimention in itself…no two positions(coordinates) in spacetime are repeated,space coordinates may remain unchanged,but positions in time ordered coordinates never repeat…i realise the wave particle duality of quantum systems disagrees with my previous statement,,,that however is only on the surface,if we were to dwelve deeper into the previous conjecture,we find it not only predicts the observation of wave particle duality,but in doing so it also explains the how and why with a degree of certainty unprecedented in quantum theory…

the laws of time (sigularity) are fundamental across all of science…we assume nothing moves faster than the speed of light,,but if time moved slower than light,light would have no speed,,,if light moved beyond the reach of time,light would be missing from the present,light would not be visible today,,it would have overtaken time,but time allows light to travel therefore time must preceed/and superseed light…

i hadnt planned to post a new blog today,but i found myself making some comments on posts,that i wanted to include in my blog….

to say space time is four dimentional,assumes any 4 positional coordinate,will continue to coexist with any other,and if that was true,yesterday would be visible,,ie;any position of 3 spacial coordinates and a time ordered position,ceases to be a system within dimentional spacetime once the coordinate of time has been ordered…a rock can hold its spacial position indefinitly,but its time ordered coordinate is never held…spacial coordinates can always be repeated(in theory),,but space time position is ,non stable,singular in its plank(for lack of a better word),,and a singularity in total,,the singularity always =total<1..and total always=plank+1..therefore plank time must be negative.

as i said this post was pretty much unplanned,and unprepared,so i hope it proves helpful…

Advertisements

a1     a
thinking of a parallax vector >d….,d1
(b1)b…=(constant)
me(d) is determined by positions a and b,,,one of these being constant,say(b)..the ratio of Me(d)/me(d1),is same as the ratio of a/a1…as d is observed a can be any position determined by position and momentum of observer within system ,,,since b is constant,,d is predetermined by a,,and its velocity,and momentum (p) relative to vp of c(which is unchanging)
that determines a system of positive mass e+positive vp,,,,
massless system,,has an unobserved a,and therefore(a/b)=1,,can only be observed at the rate of constant,,therefore is never observed as =,or >1…because d,has no intersecting points of ab so line is infinite
now if you reverse the parallax b1 a1….the system is still
d 1< d1<

observed at d,,,b is still constant,but a has a ratio of >1 relative to (b)….so while a and b determined the vector,,,and both a,and b are of same coordinates,,the velocity of a relative to b, is greater therefore (a) is observed as b,while the ratio of b1/c is <1 ,, sum of b1,and d1 observed as d1….the ratio of d/d1=the ratio (a1/c) to(b1/c)….since a1 is unobserved,the a1=0,,,and d1 is observed as the ratio of b1/d1 wich must always =>0…
in this case a particle of mass at high speed >c…is measured at =,or <c,,,and me=,or >.00000000000000000~1…..and observed as d1 where the ratio of b1/d1=ratio a1/b1…therefore a1=b1 d1>0<a1-b1…any gmeasure other than zero,,,is down to innaccuracy,,,any >o is due constant bbeing observed as the ratio of (b1>c)/c-(d1<c)….

if space is expanding,where is it going??i know sounds silly,,,but space can only expand into space,expanding assumes space has an edge,,,what follows must be more space(literal english meaning) or space(spacetime) would be confined…im not confusing the meaning,im clarifying it…if it is only expanding then how can we see it,how can any wave travel back to us,over 13billion lightyears,,,why didnt the expansion carry it away???surely it would all be travelling away…and what about the doppler effect,,,clearly there are two forces interacting,darkenergy,and dark matter…space(of spacetime) and time(of spacetime)…space time is not just space,,it is space and time,,,or neither would exist,if they didnt interact,,there could be no motion,,,we can see time but its effect are clearly present,,,remove time from space,and explain particle decay…
they must also oppose,other wise any point in space would be at a set point in time,,and as long as they remain stable relative to each other,,,nothing would change,,,the symmetry would be stable,and the universe frozen…i know its not commonly accepted yet,,,but it will be,in time…time+time=space…take five minutes to think about this,,then if you still disagree,please correct me…

Of Particular Significance

A reminder that the transit of Venus across the Sun will be visible a little over 24 hours from now (starting before sunset June 5th in the United States.)  It’s the last of your lifetime, so make your plans now.  Weather forecast across much of the eastern U.S. is pretty bad, I’m afraid. Of course there will be many places to watch on-line.  For more information, I highly recommend http://transitofvenus.nl/wp/ .  Also, though you and I can’t see Venus right now (too close to the Sun), the SOHO satellite can: click here for the latest photo, updated frequently, which shows the sun (at center, blocked out) and the sun’s corona around it, and a white dot approaching the sun, which is Venus (ignore the white horizontal lines, which are an imagining artifact).

The transit of Venus was used, historically, to figure out how big is the solar system (the…

View original post 213 more words

its funny how sometimes the simplicity of a theory,is all the evidence a theory requires,,the depth of its fundamental simplicity,is of great significance,because that allows it to be common to all,,,the more generality of a theory the more its unified as the common…its either space or time,,,if its both at once its neither,if its either/or its none,,,the first observed,is unmeasured,and the first measured is second observed….i had intended to keep it light,but yet again,got distracted by a common singularity….
anyway thanks again for the post,parallax will be one of so far a trilogy of the simplest,most fundamental laws,that imply the singularity of time as the unified common…its simplicity is what undermines its face value,but the law of absolute singularity,is the fundamental generality of totality…

imagine if gravity,was simply the flow of time…the unified theory writes itself from here…i can do that,,but the specialised physics,and collaborating science and mathematics,is best in the hands of experts…
thank you for reading,and i hope it was of interest ,what i seek is unity…

time,is my topic of choice,,,so thank you for reading,,and i look forward to conversation…
just wanted to share some thoughts on time,,,and by thoughts i mean,,analytical observation..over the years i ve collected an abundance of evidence/data/and accepted science to support it,,,in the process of putting it together, so i appreciate  any feedback..
ive come to the conclusion that time is an infinite,singular untotal…the absence of non-existance,that is tommorow,is where time begins,as it decays into exsitance as an absence…in other words,,,tommorow is not absent,it just doesnt exsist yet,,,once observed time is measured as an absence…yesterday has passed,(decayed into space),,,but the infinity of time is in its singularity,,,as time could not have a beginning,as any event must be preceeded by time…time has no floor,time cannot be measured,no matter how far back you go,time always preceeds,,,and it must for the simple observation of time is an event ,as time passes decaying into space,as tommorow approaches,before today as the absence of zero,passing as the existance of absence…an absence vital as the conseved quantity,to maintain symmetry…space is the opposite,,,as space always follows…space and time must oppose,,,otherwise if space and time did not oppose,,,then the same point in time would be fixed at a relative point in space.t..the simple fact that one point in space can appear as multiple points in time means that time must interact with space…

once upon a space in time…

Treasures of Life

Disclaimer:  I am not a Scientist or an Engineer but my mind enjoys reading about and toying in those realms. I have just enough curiosity and intuition to know if something is in the art of possible..but lack the academic formulas and theories to support my suppositions…but for what its worth here’s a stab at my concepts to support development for a new type of encryption for packets flowing through the ether.

This idea all came about when I was on a business trip in Virginia a couple of years ago…I was taking mass transportation after a full day of death by PowerPoint when my bus drove past a tall building made entirely of glass.  It was a sunny day out and there were no barriers between the bus and the building so I was able to see a perfect reflection of the bus with me inside of…

View original post 482 more words